Regarding healthcare - there is also a public health factor. If people are unhealthy they have teh potential to contract and then spread all sorts of diseases AND they will have higher health care costs that we all end up paying.
I do not think we should require companies to provide health insurance, but I am on the fence on that, but I do think that they should be required to give paid sick time. There is simply too much risk to the public in general in most companies/employers to have people coming to work sick.
There are a lot of issues to work out of course, and there will be people that abuse the system, but the reality is that companies operating in this country benefit from the public infrastructure (roads, hospitals, legal system, yada yada) and they have a responsibility to be good citizens by making it economically feasible for their workers to follow good public health practices and stay home when they are sick.
This is also why I am on the fence with requiring them to provide insurance. It is not a cost that I think businesses should pay on principal. But covering an employee in a good group plan costs about $6000 per year. I do not think it is crazy to think that in most cases a healthy employee can be at least this much more productive than an unhealthy one.
Businesses usually say if they had to do this they would hire fewer employees. That might be true but if they have XXX work to do they need a certain number of employees to perform the work. They might try to pay them less but then would be competing with other companies for employees. I think it would all work out.
That $6000 a year is about what businesses pay typical employees for unemployment insurance, social security etc.


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




Reply With Quote